Here are the key models

18.     |       declare VmsSign
19.     |           displayType: String
20.     |           routeName: String
21.     |           routeMileMarker: java.math.BigDecimal
22.     |           signId: Integer
23.     |           gisLocationLat: java.math.BigDecimal
24.     |           gisLocationLon: java.math.BigDecimal
25.     |       templateSize: String
26.     |       end


57.     |       declare RoutingIncreasing
58.     |           routeName: String
59.     |           isIncreasing: Boolean
60.     |       end


David

David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: [email protected]
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com
book: http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526

On 12/20/2012 1:11 PM, David R Robison wrote:
> Here is the original rule
>
> 1.    |       rule "Select closest upstream VMS Sign on same route"
> 2.    |       salience -200
> 3.    |       no-loop true
> 4.    |       dialect "mvel"
> 5.    |       when
> 6.    |               not IncidentWithVmsSign()
> 7.    |               $incident : Incident()
> 8.    |               $incidentRoutingIncreasing : 
> RoutingIncreasing(routeName == $incident.routeName)
> 9.    |               $sign : VmsSign($incident.routeName == routeName)
> 10.   |               not VmsSign(($incidentRoutingIncreasing.isIncreasing 
> && $sign.routeMileMarker > routeMileMarker) || 
> (!$incidentRoutingIncreasing.isIncreasing && $sign.routeMileMarker < 
> routeMileMarker))
> 11.   |       then
> 12.   |               insert(new IncidentWithVmsSign($incident, $sign));
> 13.   |       end
>
>
> Any thoughts would be helpful. David
> David R Robison
> Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
> 103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
> phone: (757) 546-3401
> e-mail:[email protected]
> web:http://openroadsconsulting.com
> blog:http://therobe.blogspot.com
> book:http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526
> On 12/20/2012 9:03 AM, David R Robison wrote:
>> I have a rule that runs fine when I execute it inside Guvnor in a Test
>> Scenario but when I run it in production I get the following error.
>>
>> Exception in thread "Thread-24" java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception
>> jitting: $incidentRoutingIncreasing.isIncreasing &&
>> $sign.routeMileMarker > routeMileMarker ||
>> !$incidentRoutingIncreasing.isIncreasing && $sign.routeMileMarker <
>> routeMileMarker
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.executeJitting(MvelConstraint.java:219)
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.access$000(MvelConstraint.java:41)
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint$1.run(MvelConstraint.java:201)
>>       at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>>       at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
>> Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
>> ConditionEvaluatorebdfa6ebae044e95bc706dfcd6f5654a, method: evaluate
>> signature:
>> (Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/drools/common/InternalWorkingMemory;Lorg/drools/reteoo/LeftTuple;)Z)
>> Expecting to find integer on stack
>>       at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0(Native Method)
>>       at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2404)
>>       at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Class.java:2714)
>>       at java.lang.Class.getConstructor(Class.java:1674)
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.asm.ClassGenerator.newInstance(ClassGenerator.java:173)
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.constraint.ASMConditionEvaluatorJitter.jitEvaluator(ASMConditionEvaluatorJitter.java:53)
>>       at
>> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.executeJitting(MvelConstraint.java:217)
>>       ... 5 more
>>
>> The rule does seem to fire. Any idea what it is trying to tell me or any
>> hints on how to debug this?
>> TNX David
>>
>



This email communication (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material intended solely for the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email immediately.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to