We will be releasing 5.6 soon.
Mark
On 20 Jan 2013, at 17:26, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't this bug hefty enough to render 5.5.0 unusable?
> -W
>
> On 20/01/2013, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote:
>> We tracked it down to the range indexing iterator, in not and exist nodes.
>> Should be fixed next week.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On 20 Jan 2013, at 08:23, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Below is another couple of test cases, showing that the problem is not
>>> due
>>> a getter that isn't called get* - it's a more general problem. As far as
>>> I
>>> can tell this rule pattern, expecting to fire in ascending order of
>>> Fact.prop, is broken in 5.5.0:
>>>
>>> rule "Rule xx"
>>> when
>>> $fact: Fact( $prop: prop )
>>> not Fact(prop < $prop)
>>> then
>>> System.out.println("Fact.prop: " + $prop);
>>> retract($fact);
>>> end
>>>
>>> // Test case using String
>>>
>>> rule init
>>> salience 9999
>>> when
>>> then
>>> insert( "AAA" );
>>> insert( "DDD" );
>>> insert( "EEE" );
>>> insert( "CCC" );
>>> insert( "BBB" );
>>> end
>>>
>>> rule "Rule 05"
>>> when
>>> $s : String()
>>> not String( this < $s)
>>> then
>>> System.out.println("String found with value: " + $s );
>>> retract($s);
>>> end
>>>
>>> // Test case using declared type
>>> declare Fact
>>> prop : long
>>> end
>>>
>>> rule init
>>> salience 999
>>> when
>>> then
>>> insert( new Fact( 1 ) );
>>> insert( new Fact( 5 ) );
>>> insert( new Fact( 6 ) );
>>> insert( new Fact( 4 ) );
>>> insert( new Fact( 2 ) );
>>> end
>>>
>>> rule "Rule 06"
>>> salience 100
>>> when
>>> $fact : Fact( $prop: prop )
>>> not Fact( prop < $prop )
>>> then
>>> System.out.println("Fact.prop: " + $prop);
>>> retract($fact);
>>> end
>>>
>>> On 20/01/2013, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> [Sorry - the previous email "escaped" before I was complete.]
>>>>
>>>> This is a self-contained DRL demonstrating the erroneous handling of
>>>> a condition involving Integer.intValue (same: Number.intValue), not
>>>> and retract, which is meant to sort the integers. This fails with 5.5.0,
>>>> but works correctly with 5.4.0 and previous versions.
>>>>
>>>> rule init
>>>> salience 9999
>>>> when
>>>> then
>>>> insert( Integer.valueOf( 10 ) );
>>>> insert( Integer.valueOf( 50 ) );
>>>> insert( Integer.valueOf( 60 ) );
>>>> insert( Integer.valueOf( 40 ) );
>>>> insert( Integer.valueOf( 20 ) );
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> rule "Rule 04"
>>>> when
>>>> $number : Integer( $i: intValue )
>>>> not Integer(intValue < $i)
>>>> then
>>>> System.out.println("Number found with value: " + $number.intValue());
>>>> retract($number);
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/01/2013, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This BAD bug was introduced on the way from 5.4.0 to 5.5.0 (and seems
>>>>>> to have sneaked into 6.0.0 as well).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only 5.4.0 and predecessors work as expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Damage control? How far can 5.5.0 be trusted?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17/01/2013, John Smith <ffirstt.lla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I am new to Drools and am trying to get the sample program to work.
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>> sample is given in the drools documentation
>>>>>>> http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/drools-expert-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e9542.
>>>>>>> This drool rule is expected to sort integers. I just changed the
>>>>>>> numbers
>>>>>>> from what are given in the sample and they do not get sorted as
>>>>>>> expected.
>>>>>>> Tried using drools version 5.5.0, 5.5.1 and the master 6.0.0, but got
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> same wrong results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Following is the main code:
>>>>>>> package com.sample;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> public class Example2 {
>>>>>>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
>>>>>>> Number[] numbers = new Number[] { wrap(5), wrap(6), wrap(4),
>>>>>>> wrap(1), wrap(2) };
>>>>>>> new RuleRunner().runRules(new String[] { "Example3.drl" },
>>>>>>> numbers);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> private static Integer wrap(int i) {
>>>>>>> return new Integer(i);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RuleRunner class is the same as given in the example and I do not
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>> I should give that here, since it will clutter the question. It
>>>>>>> simply
>>>>>>> creates the KnowledgeBase, stateful session, inserts the facts as
>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the 'numbers' array above and then calls fireAllRules method on the
>>>>>>> session.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The rule file (Example3.drl) is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rule "Rule 04"
>>>>>>> dialect "mvel"
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>> $number : Number()
>>>>>>> not Number(intValue < $number.intValue)
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>> System.out.println("Number found with value: " +
>>>>>>> $number.intValue());
>>>>>>> retract($number);
>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The output I get is as follows:
>>>>>>> Loading file: Example3.drl
>>>>>>> Inserting fact: 5
>>>>>>> Inserting fact: 6
>>>>>>> Inserting fact: 4
>>>>>>> Inserting fact: 1
>>>>>>> Inserting fact: 2
>>>>>>> Number found with value: 1
>>>>>>> Number found with value: 4
>>>>>>> Number found with value: 2
>>>>>>> Number found with value: 5
>>>>>>> Number found with value: 6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not the correct expected ascending sorted order.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What might I be doing wrong? I cannot imagine that the drools rule
>>>>>>> engine
>>>>>>> would be broken at this basic level.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Expert-does-not-sort-integers-correctly-tp4021606.html
>>>>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
