The answer to your question "is it correct that the activation-group attribute cancel the rule itself from applying to other facts?" is yes - this is the implemented behaviour.
It is, however, not quite the same as the documented behaviour (Expert, Section 4.8.1., Rule Attributes). -W On 12/02/2013, pdario <dario.piantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can anybody help? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-the-same-type-within-a-StateuflSession-tp4022157p4022236.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
