On 20/09/2013, Jonathan Knehr <jonathan.kn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am wondering if I can insert a fact, fire all activated rules, then > retract the fact all in a rules consequence.
Certainly. But the fireAllRules() would have to address a session different from the one that's executing the consequence. > > I have similar behavior using the API that I'd like to be able to do inside > a rule, as well. A consequence is just Java, so go ahead. > > The idea is that once all the rules that cause activations get fired, it > gets retracted immediately. This is so that we don't have to have cleanup > rules all over the place, and have to ensure that the salience is set > correctly. Is "it" a fact? You can retract it from the place where it was inserted, for instance. Well-designed rule sets don't have "cleanup rules all over the place". And salience is a last resort, not a first-class way of designing rule sets. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance! > > Sent from my iPhone Looks like it. -W > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
