Are you able to provide a test, for something that produces this? Mark On 28 Jan 2014, at 10:58, pmander <paul.s.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've tried to reproduce this in a tester but all my unit tests show 6.0.0 > marginally quicker. The rules and data are simplified for the test so I'll > try something closer to what i am seeing on the full system. I've just done > another comparison and the results are shown in the attached image. > <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4027884/Screenshot_2.png> > There are a number of spikes in the 6.0.1 run that don't help, but it is > clear that the 5.5.0 execution is better. I've run the tests several times > and all show the same thing. > > 1st col is average time - 250 jobs to process > 2nd col is total time for test to complete - 10 processes executing - 48 > core machine 4gb per process - mvel dialect > > For 5.5.0 > > 5854 215 > 5707 193 > 5629 189 > 5512 183 > 5607 189 > 5395 183 > 5369 183 > > For 6.0.0 > > 6229 244 > 5828 219 > 6076 223 > 5767 220 > 5735 220 > 5821 214 > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp4027822p4027884.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
