On 21/02/2014, droolster <quant.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > For developers > who are new to Drools (like me), one of the assurances we get that our > rules > are properly defined is the Rete viewer. If the Rete Viewer shows errors, > then it gives doubts about whether the rules are properly defined. In my
Are we talking about the same view, i.e., the canvas where garishly coloured blobs are shown? I would not trust this, either way. There is the parser, for syntax errors. As for logical errors, there are formal methods (difficult) and tests (...). > case, the rules still function correctly but if I am going take my rule > engine into a Production environment I want all the assurances I can get. True, but there are better ways indeed. -W _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
