1) Correct 2) Correct 3) Correct 4) Correct 5) Correct Your assumptions are spot on.
On 4 March 2014 23:22, mattmadhavan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I have some basic questions on the Drools workbench. Can some one please > validate my assumptions? > > 1) Drools workbench/Guvnor is not a replacement for Eclipse. > 2) Geeks like me develop the applications in Eclipse > 3) Drools workbench will be mainly used by the Rule authors (Business > Analysts etc) once I set it up for them. > 4) The anslysts will author the rules and test it in the workbench. > 5) They will build the DRLs into a jar and I include it as a dependency in > my POM.xml. > > How close am I to these assumptions? > > Thanks > Matt'M > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Some-basic-questions-assumptions-on-Drools-Work-bench-Guvnor-tp4028509.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
