Seems OK to me. -W
On 19/03/2014, djb <dbrownel...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry if it seems like this is an old question, but it's hard finding a > simple unambiguous example. It's a stack, right? So I push them on > 'backwards'. > > I've got 5 groups of rules, and I want the groups to fire in the order I've > described the groups as, below. > > I also don't want them to start firing as soon as a fact is inserted, which > is what seems to happen, according to my activation listener. > > So, would I do this: > -------------- > getAgendaGroup( "last group to fire" ).setFocus(); > getAgendaGroup( "second last group to fire" ).setFocus(); > getAgendaGroup( "middle group to fire" ).setFocus(); > getAgendaGroup( "second group to fire" ).setFocus(); > getAgendaGroup( "first group to fire" ).setFocus(); > > insert(facts) > > fireAllRules() > -------------- > ? > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Confirm-the-usage-of-agenda-groups-tp4028813.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users