As the documentation tries to explain, there are four rows in the heading of acondition column.
1 The first contains CONDITION (or condition). 2 The second defines the class for a Pattern. 3 The third one contains a constraint. 4 The fourth is for a comment. So, use fatca: FATCA(); Classification() for the second one and type == $param for the fourth one. -W On 26/05/2014, crosbis2 <drpatrick.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry to disturb the forum with this one. > > <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4029686/FATCA1.png> > > I want to replicate this code in a decision table. There is a parse > exception when i try to convert a table due to the code fatca : FATCA() > i.e. There is Fatca [Fatca] even though the rule validates ok. > > I know it is a pattern with no condition attached. so i tried putting it > with the actual condition and also making it standalone with condition > null. > neither will convert to a decision table even though the syntax looks > correct from the view source? > > > <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4029686/FATCA2.png> > > Anyone any ideas on what i need to do for this problem? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Excel-Syntax-in-Decision-Tables-tp4029520p4029686.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users