I’m currently setting a google group, won’t touch nabble. It allows welcome messages, sticky nodes, and if necessary moderation.
Mark On 22 Jul 2014, at 18:24, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > As long as Nabble is kept out. > > Stackoverflow is, at present, quite reasonable, with a high percentage > of what I consider as interesting, i.e., the "hard core" Expert/Fusion > questions. > > Cheers > Wolfgang > > On 22/07/2014, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >> A while back there was a discussion on the volume of posts and the range of >> post discussions. OptaPlanner already has it's own google group, which has >> helped reduce the volume. There is still the discussion on whether to split >> Drools. >> >> My initial idea is to leave this list for installation, setup, >> configuration, deployment and getting started (hello world won't run) - this >> tends to be a fairly shallow knowledge area, that new people will need to >> deal with. Then also create a separate google group for those wanting help >> on writing rule applications, that's authoring (drl, score cards, decision >> tables etc) and running (insert, fireAllRules etc); this would become a deep >> knowledge area. In the google group you would not ask how to install the >> workbench, or how to deploy your app, or how to setup HA etc. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> We are about to do 6.1 final. For this we are revamping the websites, and >> sorting out our communications (lists etc) at the same time. >> >> Mark >> >> _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users