Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a session do not connect to Guvnor anyway?
Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a service which wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could also mock the session. Although, I must admit I’m not sure what question is being asked... Steve On 8 Aug 2014, at 13:07, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > I assume you have a service encapsulating your use of Drools? > > Why not mock this service to use an implementation that returns what you need? > > > On 8 August 2014 03:13, san_hegde <santhosh.he...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi , > > > > We have requirement where in during functional testing we do not want to > connect to Guvnor rather want to mock it. > > > > For example mocking could be like this. > > > > We send Fact object as input during calling > knowledgeSession.execute() method and in rule we update the result in that > fact object itself. So here can we mock the output fact object, so that > during functional testing we no need to connect to Guvnor rather mocked > result fact object is returned. > > > > > > Thank you > > Santhosh Hegde A > > > View this message in context: Mocking Guvnor > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
