On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Patrick Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, that's quite enough for one email. Opinions?
Sounds good, but is there any chance that working code could be
accidentally broken by adding an import in another part of the file?
(i.e somehow the compiler quietly infers a different rec type than it
did before and this later produces a runtime error in the compiled
program) I don't think so but I might not have thought of everything.
Also, in Graydon's 'Syntax Changes' thread (18th May or so) I was
wondering whether tuples could be constructed with the same { } syntax
as recs, only omitting the field names. Were there any thoughts on
this idea - is it possible/desirable?
Pete
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
