----- Original Message ----- From: "Graydon Hoare" <gray...@mozilla.com> To: rust-dev@mozilla.org Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 8:16:31 AM Subject: Re: [rust-dev] Fwd: Re: Naming convention for libraries
On 01/11/2011 12:31 PM, Brian Anderson wrote: > To clarify, I looked up the proposed naming scheme and it's > 'libname-hash-version.so' where the hash is a hash of the exported > metadata (type hashes don't come into play here). Yes, this is the way the compiler *should* be producing libraries by default. Even with the recent changes to "emitting proper library names" (eg. bug #744) I don't think we're quite doing it right yet. Better though! And I *think* it was probably safe to keep "std" as "std", not "ruststd", since there's unlikely to be a collision with any normal C-ABI stuff on libstd-<hash>-0.1.so This is an excellent point. I will file a bug to implement library naming as designed and revert back to the name-based crate search. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
