On 13-07-25 05:42 AM, Benjamin Striegel wrote:
> As a professional Javascripter, I implore you keep `do` as it is. It
> really and truly is a world of difference between:
>
> do foo {
> ...
> }
>
> and:
>
> foo(|| {
> ...
> });
>
> It's one of my favorite features of Rust, and it makes higher-order
> functions feel like first-class citizens.
Ok. Nice feedback :)
>> for _ in 10.times() { ... }
>
> As the original creator of `10.times`, I was under the impression that
> we'd be moving from `for` to `do` once this change is complete. As in:
>
> do 10.times { ... }
>
> I'm baffled as to why people think something so simple and intuitive is
> "clever". :P
If we did that, we'd lose the ability to break or return, since 'do'
doesn't follow the for-style loop protocol. Maybe not that important.
-Graydon
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
