On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Josh Leverette <[email protected]> wrote:
> I really don't think it's just him that the licensing terms aren't suitable
> for. By using MPS, every single line of Rust code ever written would be
> freely requestable by any and every individual unless the company writing
> the code took care to relicense MPS or to destroy any connection MPS has to
> their code.
>
> This is no way to make a new language accepted by the community, especially
> not a FOSS community. If MPS would be happy to relicense under the MIT for
> the whole of the FOSS community, I'm sure we would get along just fine, or,
> if Rust were to drop MPS... but I don't see any way for Rust to coexist with
> MPS with its current license.
>
> So yes, an investigation into this possibility is fine, but switching to it
> should wait until the license is appropriate, in my personal opinion. No
> offense to MPS.
>

This was already taken into consideration, upstream is amenable to
relicensing, and have done so in the past. If a licensing agreement
can't be worked out, it won't be used.
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to