I'm not very familiar with Python at all, coming from C++ land. At first glance, I must say that this seems totally backward and not desirable; I'd wager any case where this for...else would come in handy has an alternate design that is just as sexy (or more) and does not require the pattern. That said, as a non-Python programmer, I may be missing out on something lovely.

Jeaye

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Michael Woerister <michaelwoeris...@gmail.com <mailto:michaelwoeris...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 08/10/2013 07:24 PM, Paul Nathan wrote:

        On 8/10/13 7:10 AM, Simon Sapin wrote:

            Hi,

            Now that the for loop is based on external iterators, can
            we reconsider
            "for-else"?

            Proposal:

                 for i in iter {
                     // ...
                 } else {
                     // ...
                 }


_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to