On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Simon Sapin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 11/08/2013 06:53, Tom Lee a écrit : > > I think your code will be more explicit if you declare a mut bool & >> check its state post-`break`. :) >> > > Resorting to boolean flags to cope with insufficient control flow feels > like Basic, which makes me sad :( > > :) I can appreciate that, but I'm still not really convinced that this "problem" deserves more syntax. That said, I might hate for..else less if it used something other than the 'else' keyword. *shrug*
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
