2013/8/26 Daniel Micay <[email protected]> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Flaper87 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also think Python's argumented assignments are fine and both a += b vs > a + > > b should behave differently. I personally read a += b as an atomic, > > thread-safe operation whereas a + b isn't and I beleive that's the way it > > shoud be. Expanding a += b to a + b doesn't sound right to me. > > > > Anyway, that's my $0.02. > > > > FF > > In C/C++/Python/Rust, `+=` isn't an atomic operation.
T_T, I knew that, bad wording from my side. > Although, in the > safe subset of Rust code there's no way to race on mutable data due to > the inability to share it without locking. > I believe this is good, I wasn't sure though. FF -- Flavio (@flaper87) Percoco http://www.flaper87.org http://github.com/FlaPer87
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
