On 1 December 2013 03:54, Daniel Micay <danielmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand the point of `do` beyond making zero-parameter > closures look a bit better. If it doesn't even do that, why bother? If > an editor isn't indenting it properly, that's an editor issue. As far > as I can tell, the vim indent file now handles it fine.
I agree, I feel do should be considered for removal - I feel the amount of sugar it provides is minimal yet it complicates the language unnecessarily. Supposing that Rust did not have the `do` syntax already, I tend to think there would be resistance to adding it for these reasons. Is there currently an issue open regarding the future of `do`? Alex _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
