If `expr @ place` suffices then you'd think that re-using `in` keyword as per `expr in place` would also work, but I believe we rejected that for technical reasons in past discussions. And if those technical reasons no longer apply, I'd like to motion that `in` looks way better than `@` there. :)
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Michael Woerister < michaelwoeris...@posteo.de> wrote: > +1 for `expr @ place` > > > On 02.12.2013 11:57, Kevin Ballard wrote: > >> With @ going away another possibility is to leave ~ as the normal >> allocation operator and to use @ as the placement operator. So ~expr stays >> the same and placement looks either like `@place expr` or `expr@place` >> >> -Kevin Ballard >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> Rust-dev@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
