On Wednesday 11 December 2013 17:27:43 John Mija wrote: > Sounds good me. > > I believed that the API would be frozen in 1.0 like Go. Besides, that > version is going to attract many developers and without a generic API to > build SQL drivers, it would be very chaotic to have different clients of > SQL engines with a different API instead of to have the same one being > able to switch between them if necessary.
I don't see why that is a problem. It requires some coordination/response by those writing DB drivers for sure, but it shouldn't require inclusion in Rust core to get a stable API. Maybe a certain amount of unpredictability during the early days is for the best... > > I think this approach will give us a higher degree of confidence that we > > don't have to live with library interfaces that are suboptimal for all > > time, since we can focus on libraries one at a time instead of freezing > > everything in one fell swoop. > > > > Patrick > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
