On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Patrick Walton <[email protected]>wrote:

> I think we need some specific examples. I personally think that between
> the colored output, printing of the erroneous lines, spelling corrections,
> suggestions of `.clone()` and so forth, rustc actually has some of the best
> diagnostics around for new statically-typed languages. But there is always
> room for improvement of course.
>

#11718 is a great example. If there are other specific things that
particularly bug me, I'll let you know ;)

-- 
Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to