On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Benjamin Striegel <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all, why a new keyword? Reusing `for` here would be totally > unambiguous. :P And also save us from creating the precedent of multi-word > keywords. >
I'd be equally happy with for instead of forall. > Secondly, currently Rust has a philosophy of use-follows-declaration (i.e. > the syntax for using something mirrors the syntax for declaring it). This > would eliminate that. > Yes, and I don't have a solution for that. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
