Hi,
On 01/02/2014 22:58, Corey Richardson wrote:
I'd be equally happy with for instead of forall.
+1 on not using forall, it sounds confusing and is actually quite a bit to type
considering how frequent these things are.
As an alternative to "for" I would want to throw "be" and "use" into the mix.
"be" is currently already reserved, but not sure how well it sounds.
Regards,
Armin
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
