Keep in mind that "end of file" and "would block" are considered "errors"...
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Palmer Cox <palmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not just modify the Lines iterator to return values of IoResult<~str>? > All the caller has to do to unwrap that is to use if_ok!() or try!() on the > returned value, so, its basically just as easy to use and it means that > errors are handled consistently. I don't see why this particular use case > calls for a completely different error handling strategy than any other IO > code. > > -Palmer Cox > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Michael Neumann <mneum...@ntecs.de>wrote: > >> >> Am 19.02.2014 08:52, schrieb Phil Dawes: >> >> Is that not a big problem for production code? I think I'd prefer the >>> default case to be to crash the task than deal with a logic bug. >>> >>> The existence of library functions that swallow errors makes reviewing >>> code and reasoning about failure cases a lot more difficult. >>> >> >> This is why I proposed a FailureReader: https://github.com/mozilla/ >> rust/issues/12368 >> >> Regards, >> >> Michael >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> Rust-dev@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
