Wow! Great job all.

I think the only major concern I had after one read-through is how we could
make downcasting safe. I can't see a way without runtime type tags on
structs, which is a non-starter. I guess I'll wait for the RFC on that one.


On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Brian Anderson <bander...@mozilla.com>wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Last week a number of us got together to hash out designs for the
> remaining features in Rust 1.0, with the goal of producing RFC's for each
> in the upcoming weeks.
>
> I'm very optimistic about how it's all going to come together, and that
> the quantity of work to be completed is reasonable.
>
> I've put the minutes for the week up on the wiki[1] for the curious, but I
> warn you that they are sometimes inscrutable.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Meeting-workweek-2014-03-03
>
> As I mentioned, folks will be writing RFC's on all the major topics to get
> feedback, and they are going to do so according to a tweaked RFC process
> aimed at introducing new features into Rust in a more controlled way than
> we have in the past. More about that later.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to