Lee Braiden wrote: > I'm sure it's more complicated than that, technically, but if it's MUCH > more technically complicated, then the compiler probably has design issues.
To defend rustc's honor: rustc has no such design issues. 1. Open src/librustc/middle/trans/expr.rs in the editor. 2. Search for "fn trans_index". 3. Put if around bounds check emission. Hope this help in case you want to maintain a fork of rustc. Actually, I think people who want no bounds checking option totally should maintain such a fork. Since change is tiny, it should be easy to keep up-to-date. > At the moment, though, it seems like this is being **politically** > complicated, when it should be up to users. Of course it is. This is a language policy issue. You seem to use the word "politically" as if it is a bad thing. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
