On 29 Mar 2014, at 2:12 pm, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently there has been a call to introduce an optional feature flag which > removes bounds checks to the *safe* subset of Rust (i.e. outside of unsafe > blocks) > > I think this sort of suggestion imperils Rust's goals as a language.
I agree that our philosophy should be formalised in a design document, but I hardly think that the language is in peril. Whilst those making the mentioned proposal have been extremely vocal in the past few days, rest assured that they are a tiny minority, and in no way represent the views of those actually working on the language. ~Brendan _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
