On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nathan Myers <n...@cantrip.org> wrote:
> The history of programming languages is littered with mistakes > around string types. There's no reason why Rust must repeat > them all. FWIW, I've worked in systems that work the way you describe, and I disagree and think Rust is doing something that's close to what I'd consider to be the right thing. -- Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
