The thought-process is (as I know it) A) Taking things out is hard, and breaks code B) 1.0 should be stable, and supported without breakage for a long time C) Adding things is pretty easy, and doesn't break code D) A stable release should happen as soon as is reasonable, to get Rust used and tested in production enviroments with production code
*Therefore, *get the language in a state that's as minimal as possible, so things can be added, but not removed. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Suminda Dharmasena <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > My thinking is that not to be too premature to get to version 1.0. > > My feeling is that there are still quite a few areas where the language > syntax and features can evolve before version 1.0 > > Suminda > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
