On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Benjamin Striegel <[email protected]> wrote:
> In addition, bringing up hypothetical CPU architectures with support for > checked arithmetic is not relevant. Rust is a language designed for 2014, > not for 2024. > So why not do the safe thing by default (which future CPUs may make fast), and provide a secondary mechanism to get the "unsafe" fast path? -- Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
