On 6/23/14 2:04 PM, comex wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Daniel Micay <danielmi...@gmail.com> wrote:I don't understand what the problem would be with my proposal to have either `checked { }` or checked operators + a lint for unchecked usage.I don't see 'checked { }' anywhere in the discussion before this message... sounds like it should be doable as a macro too.
That's what I was alluding to with "lexical scoping like C#", but I probably didn't make that clear enough for people who don't obsessively study these problems in other languages like I do. :)
Patrick _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
