> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not known about by many The install.sh script now recommends adding an entry to this variable if it detects that this is necessary, so it's not *entirely* unknown. This doesn't help, however, if it's considered a bad practice.
> 1) Link dependencies of rustc statically to it? For plugins to work, we're required to link libstd and friends dynamically to rustc, so sadly we're require to link rustc itself dynamically. > 2) On Windows the folder of the executable is always searched for > dependencies. Is this the case on Linux too? Then you could just let 'make > install' copy everything next to rustc. I do not believe that this is this case for linux or OSX, only for windows. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
