On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:31:33PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:18:33 +0900 > Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ryu/app/wsapi.py should be removed for apache license. > > This is the candidate for wsgi server. > > Another approach would be to reuse Openstack wsgi framework, but it would > > be overkill for our purose. > > > > ryu/app/wsgi.py is the wsgi framework and ryu/app/api.py is a sample. > > If this direction is okay, the wsapi client will be converted. and > > then remove wsapi.py > > > > thanks, > > > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]> > > --- > > bin/ryu-manager | 7 ++ > > ryu/app/api.py | 185 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > ryu/app/wsgi.py | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 ryu/app/api.py > > create mode 100644 ryu/app/wsgi.py > > We need the features that NOX webservices provides, e.g, spliting a > request path and passing them to classes that applications define.
That is exactly what "routes" library does. (in somewhat different way from wsapi) "routes" and "webob" provides us much better than wsapi. They are widely adopted and well-tested. If NOX API compatibility is needed, I can't think of a better way. -- yamahata ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
