Yes you are quite right. I was confused. My problem is solved.

Thank you

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:39 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:59:39 +0200
> Ruchika Luthra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sir,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. But I am still not sure, what is to be changed. In
> > the line you mentioned, it is just unpacking from the message received.
> The
> > reason  (msg.reason) must have been unpacked correctly. The problem would
> > be in the handling of the reason.
> >
> > For example as in the comments mentioned, in the packet-in class, the
> > if-else statements to handle the various reasons for packet-in.
> >
> > Where exactly would the handling require change?
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Ryu does nothing with PacketIn's
> reason. Your applicaiton does.
>



-- 

Ruchika Luthra
Student Intern
NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfürsten-Anlage 36
D-69115 Heidelberg
E-Mail: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to