Hi Giorgos,

>From your flow table, it’s very likely that the flow entry you used to drop 
>traffic between 2 hosts has a lower priority (=100) than the priorities of the 
>other 2 entries (default priority). As mentioned in this, “when adding a flow, 
>if the field is not specified, the flow's priority will default to 32768.” 
>Therefore, incoming packets will always be matched and forwarded between h1 
>and h2 by the first 2 flow entries instead of being drop by the last one. 

Hope it helps.

Regards,
Quoc Khanh

From: Giorgos Dimopoulos
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2018 10:55 PM
To: ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Ryu-devel] Rule to drop traffic between hosts in mininet doesn'twork

Hello,

I'm running mininet with the following configuration:
sudo mn --topo single,2 --mac --controller remote --switch 
ovs,protocols=OpenFlow10

on the host computer I'm running ryu with simple_switch and ofct_rest:
ryu-manager --verbose --app-lists ryu.app.simple_switch,ryu.app.ofctl_rest

then I'm using the REST API to block all traffic from h1 to h2:
curl -X POST -d '{
     "dpid": 1,
     "cookie": 0,
     "table_id": 0,
     "priority": 100,
     "flags": 1,
     "match":{
         "nw_src": "10.0.0.1/32",
         "nw_dst": "10.0.0.2/32",
         "dl_type": 2048
     },
     "actions":[
     ]
  }' http://localhost:8080/stats/flowentry/add

in mininet the OF rule appears correctly:
mininet> sh ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow10 dump-flows s1
  cookie=0x0, duration=40.692s, table=0, n_packets=4, n_bytes=336, 
in_port="s1-eth1",dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:01,dl_dst=00:00:00:00:00:02 
actions=output:"s1-eth2"
  cookie=0x0, duration=40.687s, table=0, n_packets=3, n_bytes=238, 
in_port="s1-eth2",dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:02,dl_dst=00:00:00:00:00:01 
actions=output:"s1-eth1"
  cookie=0x0, duration=5.286s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
priority=100,ip,nw_src=10.0.0.1,nw_dst=10.0.0.2 actions=drop

but the rule doesn't work since h1 can still ping h2:
mininet> h1 ping h2
PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.496 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.061 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.065 ms

am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance!

Giorgos


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to