Hello Stephen. Stephen Isard wrote in <15529-1664822950-583...@sneakemail.com>: |On Mon, 3 Oct 2022, Steffen Nurpmeso steffen-at-sdaoden.eu |s-nail| wrote: |... |>|For all I know, that might be a problem specific to office365 accounts |>|tied to organizations and someone with a personal Microsoft account |>|could be ok. If any s-nail user has chosen on their own to use |>|Microsoft as their email provider, as opposed to being outsourced to |>|them by an organization, it would be interesting if they could check. |> |> I have two free accounts on outlook.com, and i can access without |> any problem with either. | |Good.
So far yes. |> So likely it is that your organization tries to avoid getting |> third party code behind some walls. That however makes me wonder |> why your own id works without such trouble, then? | |Well, I set up the id when logged in to my organization account, so |maybe that makes it ok? I do not know, Stephen. First real contact with Microsoft since Windows 95B. (Except that this laptop does have a Windows partition, but merely five minutes therein.) I would find it surprising that you then cannot set free the application yourself, too. As a normal user. |Unsurprisingly, I get the same unverified app message if I try to |authorize with your account using flow=devicecode from an ssh login, |where running a browser on the same machine is not practical. However, |when I try with my own client id and device id, I get a different error |message: | | 'invalid_client', 'error_description': "AADSTS70002: The provided client | is not supported for this feature. The client application must be | marked as 'mobile. | |I can't see how to mark the client registration as mobile. Did "mobile" |come up when you registered your client? This is a "Mobile and desktop applications", with "Allow public client flows" enabled. I have no publisher domain, that makes it not verifiable, but i think i do not want to go further down this road, it was which made Google say something between 15K$ and 75K$ will be needed... One thing i noticed is that the application i created with the fozzi-baer (the false) account had the very same tenant as the one you gave me in private, whereas this now (the sugar.in.the.morning one) has a different one. But i have _no_ idea of tenants, and stumbling over the German variant of the Microsoft manual i stopped reading because of dozens of occurrences of the word "Mandanten", a total buzz. (To me this would have been "client", but even dict.cc hammers this one through, specifically for software user groups. Whatever.) I am a bit out of ideas Stephen. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
