On Jan 23, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Edward Loizeaux wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Richard Karnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Brother Loizeaux states "AM currently makes (shorty) heavyweights."
> He is incorrect. AM's cars are the correct length for their
> prototypes.
> The coach, combine, and observation are the correct length for
> their CNJ
> prototypes. <snip>
>
>
> Call 'em "correct" if you like, but they still are short -- short
> enough
> to go around the curved route of an AF switch. Nothing wrong with
> that
> except some fellas want something longer. An accurate model of a
> short
> prototype is a short model, which is what I called it. I didn't claim
> they were inaccurate -- just short, as in "not long". :>) But I
> will
> concede that head end cars deserve to be short. Father Dick is
> correct
> -- not short.
> Cheers...Brother Ed L.
>
I have never measured them but I was told they not tall enough.
Thank you
Larry Jackman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/