On Jan 23, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Edward Loizeaux wrote:

> --- In [email protected], Richard Karnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Brother Loizeaux states "AM currently makes (shorty) heavyweights."
> He is incorrect.  AM's cars are the correct length for their  
> prototypes.
> The coach, combine, and observation are the correct length for  
> their CNJ
> prototypes. <snip>
>
>
> Call 'em "correct" if you like, but they still are short -- short  
> enough
> to go around the curved route of an AF switch.  Nothing wrong with  
> that
> except some fellas want something longer.  An accurate model of a  
> short
> prototype is a short model, which is what I called it.  I didn't claim
> they were inaccurate -- just short, as in "not long".   :>)   But I  
> will
> concede that head end cars deserve to be short.  Father Dick is  
> correct
> -- not short.
> Cheers...Brother Ed L.
>

I have never measured them but I was told they not tall enough.
Thank you
Larry Jackman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to