George, you old hound dawg. You and your buddies are welcome in Maryville any 
time--might be more of a work session than a layout tour, though...


Fred T in Tennessee



-----Original Message-----
From: gsc3 <[email protected]>
To: S-Scale <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 7:32 pm
Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Raduis Roll Call


  
    
                  
Fred,

You are aware we (Schall, King, Morton, Odiorne, myself and others, are coming 
to your place for a layout visit in 12 months? (8-)
Earl Henry and I are dying to see PS-4's pulling the Royal Palm.

See you then, no pressure.

George Courteny
--- In [email protected], gftolhurst@... wrote:
>
> My problem is, I am afflicted with a love of passenger trains. If I ever do 
> get an S scale layout built, radii will indeed be at the top of my priority 
> list, simply to get the varnish to look as good as possible! 
> 
> 
> Of course, Bob W is right--the track plan gets limited by space very 
> quickly...
> 
> 
> Fred T in Tennessee
> 
> 
> P. S. George Courtney is more of a man of action than I. He builds while I 
> alternately dream and worry :-)
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Werre <bob@...>
> To: S-Scale <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 6:02 pm
> Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Raduis Roll Call
> 
> 
>   
>     
>                   
>         George, you're right.  If your radii is put at the top of the    
> priority list, it won't take long for even a fair sized room to    become 
> just an oval of track without a lot of operational    possibilities.  That's 
> the problem the 0 guys normally have!
>     
>     Bob Werre
>     PhotoTraxx
>     
>     
>     
>     On 11/6/12 4:49 PM, gsc3 wrote:    
>                        
>             
>  I wish I had larger radius for looks. But the trackplan,              not 
> coupler swing or lack thereof determined my radius. I              wanted to 
> accomplish certain operational moves on the              layout and this led 
> me to the radius I adopted.
>               
>               George Courtney
>


    
             

  
 

Reply via email to