I have always understood that the #5 coupler was closer to S size than HO.
What are the relative dimensions, especially the vertical pulling-face
dimension.
I have also tried the KaDee #118 tighlock/shelf, and unfortunately, that
coupler is much closer to prototype size than the regular coupler
model/prototype reductions are. Now if there could be a coupler like that only
full-scale larger. . .
The 802 as we know is the same head as for On3--what are the prototype size
relations there.
Dave Engle
