OK my point is that the rail hight is not the determining factor. I mentioned course H0, many here remember the old 'course' S standards. To get hung up on one thing is to be a nit picker.
Those who want to be ever more refined even unto Proto are fondly known as rivet counters. nothing wrong with counting rivets as that advances the hobby. BUT; Let us not degrade into nit picking. If you want to do very close to scale or even proto. Do not criticize the work of other guy who does not. My 2ยข TCC:} On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Talmadge C 'TC' Carr wrote: > All those H0 layouts using code 100 rail and code 110 wheels. Are they not > hi-rail??????? > > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:41 PM, ctxmf74 wrote: > >> As nice as Brook's layout is I imagine it doesn't get the same positive >> response from scale modelers around the hobby as Nulton's layout using more >> to scale track and wheels does..DaveBranum > > Talmadge C 'TC' Carr > Sn42 and Hn42 somewhere in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest > [email protected] Talmadge C 'TC' Carr Sn42 and Hn42 somewhere in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest [email protected] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
