Once upon a time, a long time ago, as UP was trying to assimilate CNW, a  
friend of mine working in UP engine service claimed that anything that MIGHT  
run, sometimes up to 8 units, were being put on  westbounds from Chicago,  
in the hopes that enough power would still be working at the "other end" to 
get  the train thru.    The gleaning process had just started and freight  
had to move.  Apparently repairs were more likely on the west end, as  well.  
 
Jim Lyle
 
 
In a message dated 6/23/2013 9:06:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

As has  already been pointed out, first generation UP power running in 
consist with  newer power is (was) not likely. However,  later units, such as 
GP-35's,  SD-40's, etc. is open to question, since those units lasted into the 
modern  era. Even "progressive" UP needed something to get the work done 
while they  worked the bugs out of their new wonder toys.

Another consist I  originally looked upon with skepticism was Jim 
Kindraka's mention of running  U25B's and new GE's. However, reaching into the 
dusty 
recesses of my memory of  things Santa Fe, I seem to remember U25B's running 
in consist with at least  U33C's, and maybe later power, as well. I know 
Santa Fe tried a lot of  different things to get their money's worth out of 
some of these units that  were longer on promise than on delivery.

boB Nicholson  ________________________________________________

--- In  [email protected], ken garber <garber.ken@...>  wrote:
>
> If anyone asks use the premise that they're being  deadheaded to a 
shortline
> (or museum).
> 
> And depending  on arrangements, they can also be running (working for 
their
>  fare).
> 
> Last year there was an E8A (dead-in-tow?) in the  consist of a couple of
> late model GEs.
> 
> The E8 is  circa 1949-1954.
> 
> So anything can be a prototype.
>  
> Go for it.
> 
> :)
> 
> Ken Garber
>  
> 
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:29 PM, richgajnak  <rustytraque@...>wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >  --- In [email protected], Edward Davis <edandhdavis@>  wrote:
> > >
> > > Could there have been a scenario  where a UP SD60 could have been
> > consisted with a F7? Would either  loco have to have been leased to a
> > smaller railroad? Which other  earlier diesels could have been seen to
> > lashed up with the SD60?  Don't want a stupid scene on my layout. : >)
> > >
> >  > Ed Davis
> > > Stockton
> > >
> > By the  time the SD60 appeared in 1984, F7's were already museum pieces.
>  >
> > It's doubtful that even early second gengeration units like  GP20's
> > GP/SD35's or 40's were stomping around in regular mainline  service 
unless
> > rebuilt or upgraded.
> >
> >  Rich G(ajnak)
> >
>  >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo!  Groups Links




Reply via email to