On Apr 14 2021, Grunthos <philip.john.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's unfortunate: I assume close-fs.py will suffer the same performance
> issues.
No, it should be as fast as rclone.
clone.fs uses multiple threads and downloads each block only
once. You can try to adjust the number of threads, but apart from that I
think you fundamentally cannot do any better than this (neither with
other tools nor with major code changes to S3QL).
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to s3ql+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/s3ql/871rbcll71.fsf%40vostro.rath.org.
