[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S4-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13167212#comment-13167212
]
kishore gopalakrishna commented on S4-5:
----------------------------------------
Hi Leo,
I really like this approach hiding the Guice details underneath.
Few thoughts,
* Feels like there are multiple ways to add PE to streams ( while creating the
StreamMaker s1,s2,s3) and then am.addPE.to(s2).to(s3).
* will it help separating the two one step to add stream and one step to addPE
to stream.
Also it looks like keyFinder is tied to stream
'am.addStream(EventA.class).withName("My first
stream.").withKeyFinder("{gender}")' but its actually tied not because one can
have many keyFinder on the streams.
Does this make sense
s1 = am.addStream("My first stream").ofType(EventA.class)
am.onStream(s1).invoke(PEX.class).usingKeyFinder("{gender}")
Do we really need StreamMaker and PEMaker
> Prototype app builder
> ---------------------
>
> Key: S4-5
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S4-5
> Project: Apache S4
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Leo Neumeyer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> Extend Guice AbstractModule to create a simple application builder layer. The
> idea is to evaluate if we can use Guice to do all the wiring including PEs
> and Streams and Apps.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
