>From my point of view sounds great, but depends on the costumers. If the project can go further I would "vote" in favor. Back to the original question .... What we gonna do with report? If we will be in silent, they can decide to close the project.
BR, Oleg On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:16 PM, kishore g <g.kish...@gmail.com> wrote: > Few people had shown some interest in contributing to the project. I think > S4 has good potential if it integrates with Yarn+Helix and one can use HDFS > for checkpointing. > > One of the main problems with integrating with Helix is keeping the > backward compatibility( i.e ability to migrate existing applications). If > we are willing to compromise, it makes it much easier to get a release out > with these features. We can call it S4 v2.0. > > Thoughts? > > thanks, > Kishore G > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Oleg Tikhonov <o...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > Seems that group activity goes down. > > We have to prepare the report again. > > > > Suggestions/Comments? > > > > BR, > > Oleg > > >
