Thank you, Dr. Mishra. I want to elaborate on point 1 of your inputs. I believe there is a system currently, where a person has to get a railway concession certificate against their disability certificate/UDID to avail benefits of the railways. However, this does not always guarantee availability of accessible seats for Persons with disabilities. To that extent, it would be great if:
1) IRCTC can incorporate a box on its website for disability and the kind of accommodation that would be required. For example - wheelchair till platform/seat, like the airplanes. 2) Accessible seats should be available in each class of the trains and must be made available against such reservations. 3) 3-4 small aisle wheelchairs must be made available on trains, especially on the long haul journeys. 4) Accessible washrooms at least in coaches having accessible seats must be made available 5) That should also make room on the aisle for the movement of these aisle wheelchairs. Thanks. On Tuesday, 31 December 2024 at 19:57:59 UTC+5:30 Dr.Sandeep Mishra wrote: > I want to share my concern about the railways accessibility > 1.it will be great if the coaches for PWD be in between.because currently > it is at the end of the train which leads to non-availability of proper > height of plateform as well as it becomes difficult to reach at the end as > the indicator used to be last which becomes difficult to see the location > for partially blind . > 2.proper security personnel should be available nearby to coach as many of > the incident for harrassment can be found which is non reported as well as > those coaches are occupied by non pwd personal.no grievance can be > recorded. > 3.the responsible person for accessibility should be made as per laws to > implement. > 4.approchable feedback mechanism should be there like it is happening for > cleanliness of the coaches. > 4.their should be panic button in case of harrassment of pwd in coaches > demarketed for PWD. > 5.penalisation should be there if someone is found to travelling in coach > of pwd like without ticket rules. > Thank you > Dr Sandeep Mishra > > On Tue, 31 Dec, 2024, 7:11 pm Vaishnavi Jayakumar, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> While the DEPwD gets this fixed, thought it best to share the unoffical >> OCR'ed version >> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zrlYguaBZA2nqDJCe5sO_8OEBSwDC3B4/view?usp=drive_link> >> >> myself before 2024 ends. Some inputs seem to be missing though or perhaps I >> wasn't concentrating. You could refresh your memory with the recording >> provided by DEPwD >> <https://sites.google.com/view/accessrightscoalition/meets/28-nov-depwd-meet> >> . >> >> *We have 38 days left on the Supreme Court countdown clock and had better >> get a move on!* >> >> (Bcc'ing the 6 working groups >> <https://accessoversightcommittee.wordpress.com/2024/12/26/6-working-groups-on-accessibility-sac-rajive-raturi/> >> as >> well.) >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Vaishnavi Jayakumar <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 31 Dec, 2024, 17:50 >> Subject: Re: Minutes of the stakeholder consultation on 27.11.2024 as per >> the Supreme Court directives in the Shri Rajiv Raturi Vs Union of India >> WP(C) 243/2005) case regarding accessibility standards and compliance under >> rule 15 of the RPD Rules, 2017-reg. >> To: AIC SIPDA Section <[email protected]> >> Cc: manmeetnanda <[email protected]>, Amita Dhanda <[email protected]>, >> Amar Jain <[email protected]>, A. NARAYANAN <[email protected]> >> >> >> Please resend with OCR document or original soft copy text. This is not >> text currently - it's an image and therefore not accessible to blind using >> screen readers. >> >> >> https://tools.pdf24.org/en/ocr-pdf >> >> If DEPWD can run its email attachments through this before sending, it >> will ensure basic screenreader access. >> >> I think Amar Jain had oriented team on web and social media accessibility >> which they are now doing, but somehow have lapsed with emails. >> >> Simple solution to check if document is accessible to machine translation >> or screen reading software : try selecting the text. If something gets >> selected, even if not aligned to text, it has already been OCR'ed. >> >> (Optical Character Recognition = OCR. Not a perfect solution, but will do >> for now.) >> >> >> On Tue, 31 Dec, 2024, 17:19 AIC SIPDA Section, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ma'am/Sir >>> >>> >>> >>> Please find the attached document in respect to the above mentioned >>> subject. >>> >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> >>> AIC/SIPDA Section >>> Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan) >>> Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment >>> Government of India >>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "SAC Group B Transport Ecosystem Focus Group" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sac-transport-ecosystem-group/CAN7%2BzvrJ-U8KNOcgMYm%3DVdvqZYqmLOAg5DEosJOGRt5H%2BHEVpg%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sac-transport-ecosystem-group/CAN7%2BzvrJ-U8KNOcgMYm%3DVdvqZYqmLOAg5DEosJOGRt5H%2BHEVpg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAC Group B Transport Ecosystem Focus Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sac-transport-ecosystem-group/f81d89b5-3286-4e26-9944-813a50aff089n%40googlegroups.com.
