On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 09:49:22AM -0400, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > I just brought modules_with_basis to 100% doctests. After all, it was
> > a good thing I wrote the doctests myself, as there were a couple
> > technical details you had no chance to know about.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I'll push the updated code tonight, after running the testsuite.
> >
>
> > PS: I got a little conflict with your triangularity patch. Unless
> > you shout loudly, I'll rebase your patch accordingly before pushing.
>
> Please do. Thanks again!
Done.
> > The review should now be much quicker. If you could do it shortly,
> > that would be great!
>
> I'll do my best to have this done by Monday.
Great! Have a nice week-end despite this :-)
Cheers,
Nicolas
Btw: I allowed myself to use the occasion to add a couple notes in
your patch. I also replaced occurences of F.term(j)._lmul_(c) by
F.monomial(j, c).
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
