On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:45:14AM -0700, David Kohel wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion whether OrderedSets
> (or Monoids) should have total or partial ordering.
> However, since there is a possible ambiguity, my
> preference is to not use OrderedX as an alias for
> either PartiallyOrderedX or TotallyOrderedX.
So, what do we do with the preexisting OrderedSets and OrderedMonoids?
Does anyone care if we just break backward compatibility by discarding
them?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
