On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:45:14AM -0700, David Kohel wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion whether OrderedSets > (or Monoids) should have total or partial ordering. > However, since there is a possible ambiguity, my > preference is to not use OrderedX as an alias for > either PartiallyOrderedX or TotallyOrderedX.
So, what do we do with the preexisting OrderedSets and OrderedMonoids? Does anyone care if we just break backward compatibility by discarding them? Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---