That's ok for me too. On 18 mar, 17:41, Christian Stump <christian.st...@lacim.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > > For some calculations with monoids last week, I started creating the > > Posets category, in preparation for later having several classes for > > posets, including infinite/lazy/... (see e.g. #10783) #10777 could > > also make use of that as a basis for CombinatorialPolytope. > > sounds good! > > > So I was wondering if we should not just merge all our patches > > together, cross-review them, and once this is finalized ask for a > > final review confirmation by Franco and Andrei. > > > What do you all think? > > +1 > > > If you all agree, then I can handle the merging of the patches on > > Monday. Then we could all write some small review patches on top of it > > to finalize it. It would be great if we could get that in 4.7 so that > > we can start banging more on it in May. > > perfect! > > Best, Christian
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
