Just as a heads-up, I just installed Ubuntu 11 on my laptop and
rebuilt Sage and it's now having tis same problem on a second
machine.  Perhaps something to do with a piece of upgraded software in
Ubuntu 11?

I'll play with this a bit more and see if I can make any headway in
identifying the issue.

-tom

On May 15, 12:25 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery" <nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr>
wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:29:41AM -0700, tom d wrote:
> > Yeah, so the failure's definitely happening in the check for version
> >guards.  I added a couple print statements in the update script to try
> > to figure out what's happening; does this look like the right kind of
> > thing to you?
>
> > current sage version:  [4, 6, 2]
> > hg_all_guards:  ['guardsin series file:', ' 1  +4_1_2', ' 2  -4_3_1',
> > ' 3  +4_3_1', ' 1  -4_3_2', ' 2  +4_3_2', ' 2  +4_3_3', ' 1  +4_3_3:',
> > ' 2  +4_3_4', ' 1  -4_4', ' 1  +4_4', ' 2  +4_4_1', ' 1  +4_4_2', ' 1
> > +4_4_3', ' 1  +4_4_4', ' 2  -4_5', ' 4  +4_5', ' 3  -4_5_2', ' 1
> > +4_5_2', ' 1  +4_5_3', ' 1  -4_6', ' 1  +4_6', ' 9  -4_6_1', ' 1
> > +4_6_1', ' 4  -4_6_2', ' 2  +4_6_2', ' 1  -4_7', '45  +4_7', ' 7
> > +4_7_1', ' 1  +5_0', '150  NONE', ' 3  +coerce', '18  +disabled', ' 3
> > +experimental', ' 1  +free_to_assign', ' 1  +fun', ' 1
> > +keep_for_possible_future_use', ' 1  +long_compilation', ' 1
> > +needs_rebase', ' 1  +not_finished', ' 1  +not_wanted', ' 1
> > +power_zero', ' 2  +tentative_implementation', ' 1  +words_ng_fixme']
> > versionguards:  []
> > allguards:  []
>
> > The script takes the output of the hg_all_guards() function (given
> > above) and then uses a method to figure out if it's a new version
> > guard or not; this check is apparently always returning false.  So the
> > question is whether the hg_all_guards output above looks sensible, or
> > whether it's funky somehow (like, say, those leading numerals).
>
> Ah! The leading numerals seem funky indeed, and could well point to
> the issue. I don't get them when I do
>
>         > sage -hg qselect -s
>         +4_1_2
>         -4_3_1
>         ...
>
> Can you try disabling everything in your hgrc except for the
> hgext.mq=, and see if sage -hg qselect -s returns to a normal
> behaviour?
>
> Cheers,
>                                 Nicolas
> --
> Nicolas M. Thi ry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to